© 2007 Kakiblog.com
Kakiblog.com header image

Terima Kasih Tun Mahathir

March 10th, 2008 · 16 Comments

Well I guess all of us are still in the state of shocked from the fresh PRU-12. Most people will remember this occasion as the worst campaign for BN since independence. Apparently, I strongly think it should be remembered as the time Malaysians wake up from their day-dreaming state and critically deciding from the ballot boxes. It’s a huge transition in Malaysian Politics and voters maturity in weighing their future seriously.

Many BN full-hearted supporters sent me messages that express their discontent and disappointment with scholars who are studying overseas sponsored by “the government” are happily chanting opposition themes. They even made it sound blasphemous and strongly reflecting these students as traitors to the nation. It sounds so ridiculous. Many are not able to differentiate between “government’s money” and “rakyat’s money”. As a matter of fact, the scholarships are based on my parents money, Pak Abu’s money, Lim’s money, Bala’s money etc. It’s from the tax-payers money. In short, I strongly think that these scholars are not indebted to the government, instead they owe the people the knowledge that they earn by being honest and critical in their judgement for the good of the many.

Some other messages are flowered with racial sentiments. They said “ aren’t you afraid of being ruled by Chinese…there are a lot of them from DAP and KeADILan that won seats in the parliament”…some said,” Do you really think that the newly formed government can do any better? You will see all their lies and you will feel sorry for it in the future”. My answer is simple, there is no guarantee that they are going to perform, if they don’t, we have the power to make changes in the coming elections taking into account the public is getting better in their judgements and their involvement in the recent times have been phenomenal.

Statistically, I believe everyone knows that the BN has been denied their 2/3 majority that they have been enjoying for the almost forever. So there is no need for me to reiterate that fact. In essence they have been so incompetent and complacent in their performance that they think there is no risk of losing the power; they believed Malaysians have voted and will vote for them regardless of anything. The perwakilan in the parliamentary seats (most of them) do not have to even listen to any of the proposals from BN to agree with it. They just have to turn up (some datang untuk tidur, and some others come to curse), raise their hand and say yes then they get their allowance and go back happily. Bear in mind that there have been a number of instances the people who competed in the election and won were actually being put to win by the party. So the drive to honestly represent the people in the parliament is certainly lacking.

It is so irresistible to ask oneself how would a coalition that had the biggest victories in Malaysian history (PRU-11) just suffered the worst ever defeat in the last few days. There are a lot of people and parties who deserve the credit of turning around the table. Bloggers; they have been consistently writing online either just to spur some speculations or come up with valid facts and sources. They have enlightened Malaysians who have access to internet (which support a rumour why internet connection in Malaysia hasn’t been improving; the government do not want people in kampong to have access). Not forgetting the release of DSAI. Since his release, he has been travelling in and out of the country, using both local independent and respected international broadcasts. No one can deny that he is one of the pulling factors for voters to convincingly opt for opposition parties. Its hard to imagine DAP at one side and PAS on the other with totally different principles. Well DSAI almost successfully represents both of the extremes and most of the gap in the middle. On top of that, credit has to go to Malaysian public for their willingness to finally open up and be critical about national issues.

However, my personal opinion says that most of the credit should go to Dr Mahathir. I believe that this doesn’t sound as popular to most of the readers and others. If we look back to history, he has been in power for so long that anyone who he thinks threatening him will certainly be cut off and metaphorically “killed”. He is one hell of a politician. So when he stepped down, many wondered why he chose Pak lah as opposed to other better candidates. As with Dr M’s capabilities and intelligence, it is almost impossible that he “would think” Pak Lah was the best successor Malaysian could have ever had in the early 2000s. With 1999 history packed together with Dr M’s retirement package, he is not being perceived or celebrated as “he might hope for” after almost 40 years serving the country. It is important to note that I am not saying that Dr M was a better leader of the country during his 20 year stint, he was merely a lot more stronger than Pak Lah in terms of pressing freedom of thoughts. Imagine if we were treasuring this sort of free media during his time, I think the exposure of the amount of corruption and all might have been worse.’
As I can see it, Dr M might have engineered and hoped that the election would turn out this bad so that people will not remember him as the PM that suffers the worst BN defeat in history. In addition, why would he harshly condemned his most trusted man. He personally chose Pak lah, and now he is killing him. Maybe he chose the best victim. Hurm..that probably has the some logical sense. Even so, why would I thank him in this public blog. Definitely I am not celebrating his smile in his sleep at night nor I chant his name as a national savior. Whatever his reason might be, Pak Lah succeeded him without enough support and loyalty and respect to maintain a strong leadership thus creating a huge segregation and doubts among the party and cabinet and even the public. His fragility benefiting Dr M for his personal conquest for fame. Plus with Pak Lah easy+sleepy character, he is easier to be manipulated by those who have been eager to exploit nation’s wealth and decision making process. His era of management has given a vast room for people to take advantage and capitalize. This includes the Malaysian public. It seems like the pressure of not being able to decide has finally being lifted bit by bit from the people. Thus for all these three years, Malaysians have embarked to a new level of political maturity that has led to the biggest turn out to vote. (+-80%)

So even Dr M might have had his own agendas, he has created a situation where the Malaysian political arena becomes more competitive and vigorous by letting the “weakest” successor to rule after his pressing 20 years. I believe that this has benefited the public the most. Well I am not celebrating the victories of the opposition and the failures of BN, rather my biggest relief is that Malaysians finally able to express their concerns and their rights to chose who ever should be running the country during elections. The fear that has been transplanted by the Dr M regime is slowly fading away while at the same time, Malaysians have been eager to set and fly free. On the other hand, there are a large number of voters voted for BA simply not because they supported them, but because they just “do not want to vote for BN”. So many exercised their right as a sign of warning, which I think is still reasonable and valid. Fundamentally, the situation forces any ruling government to perform good governance, improve transparency and efficiency as they have to keep in mind that Malaysians are no more a bunch of jokers that they can cheat and take for granted, its either they perform or see the exit door in the next election. Thank you Dr M for caging and making us desperately wanting for freedom during your era, and cutting our hand loose today with a new easy going regime. Dr M, you gain the fame, we gain the freedom.

Tags: Nasional · Politik · Umum

16 responses so far ↓

  • Adely // Mar 10, 2008 at 10:42 pm

    well said.
    plus, if the overseas students (generally taken as more brilliant and the juice of Malaysia’s citizen), go for the opposition, that does raise some questions… thats what we should think about rather than saying they are all ‘budak2 x sedar diri’.

  • Antares // Mar 10, 2008 at 10:57 pm

    Well, you certainly have Mahathir to thank for showing us the meaning of authoritarianism and the rule of fear - and forcing the brighter ones amongst us to make a massive break for freedom!

  • Implosion // Mar 11, 2008 at 1:19 am

    I agree with Antares.
    Nothing can be as bad as it was when he was PM.
    I’m sure Malaysia will never publish or even keep track of the statistics on how many graduates left Malaysia to work overseas/educated graduates migrated overseas during Dr.M’s time as PM.

    What I do have are Australian (And that’s ONLY ONE country!) stats. And the numbers of Chinese and Indians from Malaysia who migrated here rose sharply during his years and peaked in their highest numbers. The numbers are still currently high.

    Can you imagine the numbers who enter Singapore, Hong Kong or UK? Can you imagine the numbers when they’re all added up?????
    DO THE MATHS.

  • cidos // Mar 12, 2008 at 4:00 am

    dear Implosion,

    your claim is invalid since there is no way to make comparison with. Mahathir was the only PM served for 22 years. (mind you with rapid economic development)

  • rakyat Malaysia // Mar 13, 2008 at 5:45 am

    nothing as bad as it was when Mahathir was PM?

    I disagree. I personally think that current situation is worse. Economics fall down. Corruption rises. There are so many blatant use of powers. OIC weakens. THings that happens during Mahathir ascendancy reoccurs. New bad things added up.

  • Pena Hikmah // Mar 13, 2008 at 11:48 am

    What he meant by “nothing as bad as it was when mahathir was PM” is that the ppl at that time were less informed and not too harsh to say ignorant compared to now, i think.

  • DHL // May 2, 2008 at 6:25 am

    hubungan TUN dan KHIR TOYO

    http://www.raksasabn.blogspot.com

  • rina // Jun 2, 2008 at 4:48 am

    Mahathir was ‘Indian” when he put in his application to University of Singapore. When he destroyed UMNO and started his UMNO Baru, he put down “Malay” as his race. Ask him if that is true or not. Then judge everything he has said and done by the same yardstick. He and his gang has wasted billions of dollars of rakyat’s oil money while his cronies have been stealing us all blind. When the Govt send you overseas, it is using your money, not Mahathir’s or Pak Lah’s money. You don’t owe anything to the Govt…only to your country.

  • Coward Malaysians’ Attitude [Editted] « KidPieces // Jun 9, 2008 at 11:48 am

    [...] Terima Kasih Tun Mahathir [...]

  • UMNO big loss II « KidPieces // Jun 9, 2008 at 12:00 pm

    [...] Terima Kasih Tun Mahathir [...]

  • UMNO big loss I « KidPieces // Jun 9, 2008 at 12:02 pm

    [...] Terima Kasih Tun Mahathir Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)UMNO big LossUMNO Minus Mahathir   [...]

  • adyku // Jun 11, 2008 at 7:37 am

    well…i cant say no or yes.. but wut i would like to say is, this country hv been thru a lot of changes, since we kicked out the communist party 50 years ago(they never surrendered if u looked back) and to the latest birth of putrajaya..
    the government did waste a lot of the people’s money lately. and i never thought it would ended up this way. so from what i have gained knowledge of this whole issue.. Pak Lah should either get some free advice from experienced leaders of this country or he should listen to himself instead of listening to his favt. son-in-law or whoever that is, who is trying to make the people’s decision as it was his decision.

  • batigol // Jun 25, 2008 at 4:25 am

    I respect ur anger but not ur words.

  • crancysaste // Oct 21, 2008 at 2:03 pm

    Hi! cordarone

  • Krestort // Apr 23, 2009 at 11:38 am

    Recently one of my friends started an obsession with the actor Nicholas Cage (mostly because their names are both Nicholas - sounds strange but he is strange and that isn’t the point). After asking around the rest of my friends he seems to be a very controversial figure.
    What does the forum think? do you love the all action superhero? Or do you hate the droning voice of the man who does nothing but action shooters?

  • psevdolokulop // Jul 15, 2009 at 7:05 pm

    How many times you eat during a normal … every day life?
    are you the type of person who eats a bit and often?
    or rarely and too much?

    i usually have 3 and i’m the 2nd type of person (though it’s not that healthy)

    8 am breakfast

    3pm lunch

    9pm a snack.

Leave a Comment